LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF MBBR-BASED WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT (CASE STUDY: WWTP OF A SOAP AND COSMETIC INDUSTRY)

Authors

  • Fadyah Rahmanina Susanti Patingari President University ID
  • Yosef Barita Sar Manik President University ID

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23029227

Keywords:

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP), Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR), Soap and Cosmetics Industry, Environmental Impact, ReCiPe 2016

Abstract

Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in the soap and cosmetics industry are often assessed primarily through effluent compliance,overlooking environmental burdens from electricity, chemical use, and sludge management. This study applies Life CycleAssessment (LCA), following ISO 14040/14044, to a full-scale Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR)-based WWTP treating high-strength wastewater at a soap and cosmetics manufacturing facility in West Java, Indonesia. The gate-to-gate system was modeled using 36 months of operational data and ecoinvent v3.10 background data, with impacts assessed for 1,000 m³ of treated wastewater using ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint (H) in openLCA. The impact assessment showed a global warming potential of 216,928.1 kg CO₂ eq, fossil resource scarcity of 60,277.8 kg oil eq, terrestrial ecotoxicity of 511,267.9 kg 1,4-DCB, freshwater ecotoxicity of 4,730.3 kg 1,4-DCB, and human non-carcinogenic toxicity of 203,723.9 kg 1,4-DCB, The MBBR aeration blower, EQ tank pump, centrifuge decanter motor, and DAF transfer pump accounted for over 85% of electricity consumption. Terrestrial Ecotoxicity andHuman Non-Carcinogenic Toxicity were primarily associated with chemical production and sludge-borne contaminants, while Global Warming and Fossil Resource Scarcity were mainly linked to electricity consumption and fossil-based power generation. Overall, chemical use and electricity consumption were key contributors to the WWTP’s environmental footprint, highlighting chemical dosage optimization and energy efficiency as potential improvement strategies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andreottola, G., Foladori, P., Ragazzi, M., & Villa, R. (2002). Dairy wastewater treatment in a moving bed biofilm reactor. Water Science and Technology, 45(12), 321–328. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2002.0441

Bogacki, J. P., Marcinowski, P., Naumczyk, J., & Wiliński, P. (2017). Cosmetic wastewater treatment using dissolved air flotation. Archives of Environmental Protection, 43(2), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1515/aep-2017-0018

Corominas, L., Byrne, D. M., Guest, J. S., Hospido, A., Roux, P., Shaw, A., & Short, M. D. (2020). The application of life cycle assessment (LCA) to wastewater treatment: A best practice guide and critical review. Water Research, 184, 116058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.116058

di Biase, A., Kowalski, M. S., Devlin, T. R., & Oleszkiewicz, J. A. (2019). Moving bed biofilm reactor technology in municipal wastewater treatment: A review. Journal of Environmental Management, 247, 849–866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.053

Dlangamandla, C., Ntwampe, S. K. O., Basitere, M., Chidi, B. S., & Okeleye, B. I. (2023). Biodefoamer-Supported Activated Sludge System for the Treatment of Poultry Slaughterhouse Wastewater. Applied Sciences, 13(16), 9225. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13169225

Finkbeiner, M. (2014). The International Standards as the Constitution of Life Cycle Assessment: The ISO 14040 Series and its Offspring. In W. Klöpffer (Ed.), Background and Future Prospects in Life Cycle Assessment (pp. 85–106). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8697-3_3

Gkika, D. A., Mitropoulos, A. C., Lambropoulou, D. A., Kalavrouziotis, I. K., & Kyzas, G. Z. (2022). Cosmetic wastewater treatment technologies: a review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(50), 75223–75247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23045-1

International Organization for Standardization. (2006). ISO 14044:2006 Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Requirements and guidelines. ISO.

Kartikasari, I. B., & Santoso, R. I. B. (2023). Impact of Drinking Water Treatment Process Using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to Minimize Environmental Impact Risk. Journal of Social Research, 2(9), 3218–3230. https://doi.org/10.55324/josr.v2i9.1294

Laouane, H., El Joumri, L., Halhaly, A., Arid, Y., Labjar, N., & El Hajjaji, S. (2026). Life-Cycle Assessment of Wastewater Treatment: Enhancing Sustainability Through Process Optimization. Sustainability, 18(2), 605. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18020605

Larsen, H. F. (2017). LCA of wastewater treatment. In Life Cycle Assessment: Theory and Practice. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56475-3_34

Madan, S., Madan, R., & Hussain, A. (2022). Advancement in biological wastewater treatment using hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR): a review. Applied Water Science, 12(6), 141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-022-01662-y

Ødegaard, H. (2006). Innovations in wastewater treatment: –the moving bed biofilm process. Water Science and Technology, 53(9), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2006.284

Rashid, S. S., Harun, S. N., Hanafiah, M. M., Razman, K. K., Liu, Y.-Q., & Tholibon, D. A. (2023a). Life Cycle Assessment and Its Application in Wastewater Treatment: A Brief Overview. Processes, 11(1), 208. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11010208

Rashid, S. S., Harun, S. N., Hanafiah, M. M., Razman, K. K., Liu, Y. Q., & Tholibon, D. A. (2023b). Life Cycle Assessment and Its Application in Wastewater Treatment: A Brief Overview. In Processes (Vol. 11). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11010208

Rebello, T. A., Roque, R. P., Gonçalves, R. F., Calmon, J. L., & Queiroz, L. M. (2021). Life cycle assessment of urban wastewater treatment plants: A critical analysis and guideline proposal. Water Science and Technology, 83, 501–514. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2020.608

Singh, A., Kamble, S. J., Sawant, M., Chakravarthy, Y., Kazmi, A., Aymerich, E., Starkl, M., Ghangrekar, M., & Philip, L. (2018). Technical, hygiene, economic, and life cycle assessment of full-scale moving bed biofilm reactors for wastewater treatment in India. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(3), 2552–2569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0605-y

Tran, D., & Weidhaas, J. (2024). Life Cycle Assessment of Industrial Wastewater Treatment Trains. Advanced Sustainable Systems, 8. https://doi.org/10.1002/adsu.202400246

Yang, X., López-Grimau, V., Vilaseca, M., & Crespi, M. (2020). Treatment of Textile Wastewater by CAS, MBR, and MBBR: A Comparative Study from Technical, Economic, and Environmental Perspectives. Water, 12(5), 1306. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12051306

Zebua, S. N., & Manik, Y. B. S. (2025). Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of the Wastewater Treatment Plant of a Lead-Acid Battery Manufacturing Industry. JST (Jurnal Sains Dan Teknologi), 14(3), 577–589. https://doi.org/10.23887/jst-undiksha.v14i3.102724

Downloads

Published

2026-09-23

How to Cite

Fadyah Rahmanina Susanti Patingari, & Yosef Barita Sar Manik. (2026). LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF MBBR-BASED WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT (CASE STUDY: WWTP OF A SOAP AND COSMETIC INDUSTRY). Bulletin of Engineering Science, Technology and Industry, 4(4), 2105–2115. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23029227

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.