FROM RISK TO OPPORTUNITY: STRATEGIES FOR PROFITABLE AND RESILIENT INFRASTRUCTURE IN HAZARD-PRONE KASHMIR VALLEY, INDIA
Main Article Content
Asif Bashir
Naseer Ahmad Bhat
Amir Arshid
Shagufta Mohi ud din
Muskan Nazir
Amir Wani
Infrastructure development in geologically unstable regions demands an integrated approach that harmonizes engineering resilience with economic viability. This study critically examines the vulnerabilities posed by earthquakes, landslides, and soil instability in the Kashmir Valley, emphasizing their ramifications on infrastructure investment. By leveraging geotechnical risk assessments, structural vulnerability analyses, and economic modeling, the research delineates pathways for sustainable and profitable infrastructure development in hazard-prone zones. Through empirical case studies and global best practices, the study underscores the efficacy of innovative construction methodologies such as seismic retrofitting, base isolation, and bioengineering solutions for slope stabilization. Additionally, the financial dimension is scrutinized through cost-benefit analyses, which reveal the long-term fiscal prudence of investing in resilient infrastructure, mitigating potential economic losses. Policy frameworks, including risk-informed zoning regulations and incentivized public-private partnerships, are examined to foster risk-adjusted investment strategies. The findings advocate for a paradigm shift wherein geological risks are repositioned as opportunities for pioneering robust, disaster-resistant infrastructure that aligns with sustainability imperatives. The study’s recommendations serve as a pathway for policymakers, engineers, and investors seeking to fortify infrastructure against natural hazards while ensuring economic feasibility.
Aerts, J., et al. (2018). Flood risk management and economic resilience: The case of the Netherlands’ Delta Works. Environmental Research Letters, 13(2), 025007.
Bilham, R. (2019). Seismic hazard in the Himalayas: A review. Nature Geoscience, 12(7), 575-581.
Bozorgnia, Y., et al. (2021). Performance-based seismic design for urban infrastructure. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 50(3), 443-460.
Chang, L., et al. (2018). GIS-based hazard assessment for landslide-prone regions. Remote Sensing of Environment, 211, 163-175.
Cummins, J. D., & Weiss, M. A. (2018). Catastrophe bonds and infrastructure resilience. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 85(1), 1-27.
Das, S., et al. (2022). AI-driven geotechnical modeling for infrastructure resilience. Computers and Geotechnics, 150, 104715.
Daniell, J. E., et al. (2017). Economic impact analysis of the 2015 Nepal earthquake. Natural Hazards, 89(2), 881-900.
Dikshit, A., & Sarkar, R. (2020). Landslide hazard mapping in the Himalayas. Geomorphology, 350, 106897.
European Commission (2021). Climate-Resilient Infrastructure Policy. European Commission Report.
FEMA (2020). Earthquake risk assessment in the U.S. FEMA Technical Report.
Ghosh, S., & Saha, S. (2021). Economic models for geohazard resilience. Journal of Economic Geology, 45(3), 221-238.
Hallegatte, S., et al. (2019). Economic costs of disasters and resilience investment. Nature Sustainability, 2(9), 706-713.
Ikeda, S., & Shimizu, H. (2021). Seismic resilience strategies in Japan’s infrastructure. Structural Safety, 92, 102127.
Jayasooriya, V. M., et al. (2018). Green infrastructure for slope stability. Ecological Engineering, 120, 97-107.
Kousky, C. (2014). The financial implications of natural disasters. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 6, 249-268.
Loh, C. H., et al. (2019). Biotechnical slope stabilization for landslide-prone areas. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 37(5), 3733-3750.
McKinsey Global Institute (2021). The economic value of resilient infrastructure. McKinsey Report.
Mohammadi, M., et al. (2020). Advanced seismic retrofitting using FRPs. Composite Structures, 238, 111908.
Smith, J., et al. (2020). Integrating geoscience and business risk assessment. Journal of Infrastructure Resilience, 12(1), 56-72.
Zhou, X., et al. (2021). Remote sensing techniques in infrastructure risk monitoring. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 42(5), 1423-1440.
